Use the data export button to extract customised data sets from the Ship Plan and Survey Report Collection. Available in TSV and CSV formats.
Name of ship as recorded on the record
The process of transferring a vessel to water, but not necessarily her completion.
The port or place in which the vessel’s construction took place, at the time of writing.
The listed port to which a given vessel belongs.
London ( Iron Ships Report for Witch of the Tees, 5th May 1856 1856 )
West Hartlepool ( Annual Surveys Report for Witch of the Tees, 18th August 1864 1864 )
An officially licensed mariner (post 1850) holding ultimate command and responsibility for a vessel.
Location where a vessel’s survey was undertaken.
Stockton; Hartlepool ( Iron Ships Report for Witch of the Tees, 5th May 1856 1856 )
London ( Report of Survey for Repairs; Trienniel Survey for Witch of the Tees, 29th July 1863 1863, Annual Surveys Report for Witch of the Tees, 18th August 1864 1864 )
Recorded information related to a vessel’s movements.
London; Australia ( Iron Ships Report for Witch of the Tees, 5th May 1856 1856 )
London; West Hartlepool; New Zealand ( Report of Survey for Repairs; Trienniel Survey for Witch of the Tees, 29th July 1863 1863 )
London; Moreton Bay ( Annual Surveys Report for Witch of the Tees, 18th August 1864 1864 )
Physical arrangement of a ship’s masts, sails and rigging.
Predominant material(s) utilised in a vessel’s construction.
A ship’s total internal volume in ‘register tons’ (replaced by gross tonnage post 1982).
Is machinery fitted at the aft of the vessel?
Generally a smaller additional auxiliary boiler (often used while the vessel is at port).
Name of the Proving House responsible for the public testing and certification of a vessel’s anchors and/or chain cables.
The year in which a vessel’s construction is completed.
The individual and/or organisation listed as having been responsible for constructing the vessel. This can/may be the same as the owner and/or manager.
Abbreviations of the names of ports with Lloyd’s Register survey offices.
The individual and/or organisation listed
Johnson & Co ( Iron Ships Report for Witch of the Tees, 5th May 1856 1856 )
Joseph McClaudy ( Report of Survey for Repairs; Trienniel Survey for Witch of the Tees, 29th July 1863 1863 )
J Mellanby ( Annual Surveys Report for Witch of the Tees, 18th August 1864 1864 )
Name of surveyor.
John McEwen ( Iron Ships Report for Witch of the Tees, 5th May 1856 1856 )
Classification symbol assigned to a vessel by Lloyd’s Register’s Classing Committee denoting the quality of construction and maintenance.
A1 for 9 years built of iron ( Iron Ships Report for Witch of the Tees, 5th May 1856 1856 )
9A1 ( Report of Survey for Repairs; Trienniel Survey for Witch of the Tees, 29th July 1863 1863, Annual Surveys Report for Witch of the Tees, 18th August 1864 1864 )
The name of the port/place of destination given.
Australia ( Iron Ships Report for Witch of the Tees, 5th May 1856 1856 )
West Hartlepool; New Zealand ( Report of Survey for Repairs; Trienniel Survey for Witch of the Tees, 29th July 1863 1863 )
Moreton Bay ( Annual Surveys Report for Witch of the Tees, 18th August 1864 1864 )
A vessel’s means of propulsion.
Is the steamer assisted by sail?
Confirmation as to whether the vessel was equipped with refrigeration machinery to aid in the transport of frozen or chilled cargo/goods.
No ( Iron Ships Report for Witch of the Tees, 5th May 1856 1856, Report of Survey for Repairs; Trienniel Survey for Witch of the Tees, 29th July 1863 1863, Annual Surveys Report for Witch of the Tees, 18th August 1864 1864 )
Does the vessel possess an auxiliary power source?
Is electric lighting fitted to the vessel?
Have you noticed missing or incorrect data or images for this ship?
Please let us know and we will rectify the issue as soon as possible.