Use the data export button to extract customised data sets from the Ship Plan and Survey Report Collection. Available in TSV and CSV formats.
Name of ship as recorded on the record
Utrecht ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868, Certificate for Vessels Navigated by Steam for Utrecht, 9 October 1868 1868, Correspondence from Louis Meyer to George B Seyfang, secretary of Lloyds Register London regarding Utrecht, 21 October 1868 1868, Correspondence regarding Utrecht, 20 October 1868 1868, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Longitudinal plan for Utrecht no date, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Plan of the afterend of Utrecht no date, Midship section for Ultrecht no date )
The process of transferring a vessel to water, but not necessarily her completion.
01/08/1868 ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868, Certificate for Vessels Navigated by Steam for Utrecht, 9 October 1868 1868, Correspondence from Louis Meyer to George B Seyfang, secretary of Lloyds Register London regarding Utrecht, 21 October 1868 1868, Correspondence regarding Utrecht, 20 October 1868 1868, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Longitudinal plan for Utrecht no date, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Plan of the afterend of Utrecht no date, Midship section for Ultrecht no date )
The port or place in which the vessel’s construction took place, at the time of writing.
Bolnes ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868, Certificate for Vessels Navigated by Steam for Utrecht, 9 October 1868 1868, Correspondence from Louis Meyer to George B Seyfang, secretary of Lloyds Register London regarding Utrecht, 21 October 1868 1868, Correspondence regarding Utrecht, 20 October 1868 1868, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Longitudinal plan for Utrecht no date, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Plan of the afterend of Utrecht no date, Midship section for Ultrecht no date )
Abbreviations of the names of ports with Lloyd’s Register survey offices.
Ant ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868 )
The listed port to which a given vessel belongs.
Rotterdam ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868 )
An officially licensed mariner (post 1850) holding ultimate command and responsibility for a vessel.
Hoogstraten ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868 )
Location where a vessel’s survey was undertaken.
Bolnes; Antwerp ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868 )
Rotterdam; Antwerp ( Certificate for Vessels Navigated by Steam for Utrecht, 9 October 1868 1868 )
The name of the port/place of destination given.
Java ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868 )
Predominant material(s) utilised in a vessel’s construction.
Composite (iron and wood) ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868, Certificate for Vessels Navigated by Steam for Utrecht, 9 October 1868 1868, Correspondence from Louis Meyer to George B Seyfang, secretary of Lloyds Register London regarding Utrecht, 21 October 1868 1868, Correspondence regarding Utrecht, 20 October 1868 1868, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Longitudinal plan for Utrecht no date, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Plan of the afterend of Utrecht no date, Midship section for Ultrecht no date )
A ship’s total internal volume in ‘register tons’ (replaced by gross tonnage post 1982).
2173 ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868 )
Type of timbering specifically utilised for the vessel’s exterior.
RiP - Riga Pine ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868 )
Confirmation as to whether the vessel was equipped with refrigeration machinery to aid in the transport of frozen or chilled cargo/goods.
No ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868, Certificate for Vessels Navigated by Steam for Utrecht, 9 October 1868 1868, Correspondence from Louis Meyer to George B Seyfang, secretary of Lloyds Register London regarding Utrecht, 21 October 1868 1868, Correspondence regarding Utrecht, 20 October 1868 1868, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Longitudinal plan for Utrecht no date, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Plan of the afterend of Utrecht no date, Midship section for Ultrecht no date )
Does the vessel possess an auxiliary power source?
No ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868, Certificate for Vessels Navigated by Steam for Utrecht, 9 October 1868 1868, Correspondence from Louis Meyer to George B Seyfang, secretary of Lloyds Register London regarding Utrecht, 21 October 1868 1868, Correspondence regarding Utrecht, 20 October 1868 1868, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Longitudinal plan for Utrecht no date, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Plan of the afterend of Utrecht no date, Midship section for Ultrecht no date )
Is electric lighting fitted to the vessel?
No ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868, Certificate for Vessels Navigated by Steam for Utrecht, 9 October 1868 1868, Correspondence from Louis Meyer to George B Seyfang, secretary of Lloyds Register London regarding Utrecht, 21 October 1868 1868, Correspondence regarding Utrecht, 20 October 1868 1868, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Longitudinal plan for Utrecht no date, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Plan of the afterend of Utrecht no date, Midship section for Ultrecht no date )
Measurement from the extreme outboard point of starboard to the extreme outboard point of port.
45' 6" ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868 )
The year in which a vessel’s construction is completed.
1868 ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868, Certificate for Vessels Navigated by Steam for Utrecht, 9 October 1868 1868, Correspondence from Louis Meyer to George B Seyfang, secretary of Lloyds Register London regarding Utrecht, 21 October 1868 1868, Correspondence regarding Utrecht, 20 October 1868 1868, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Longitudinal plan for Utrecht no date, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Plan of the afterend of Utrecht no date, Midship section for Ultrecht no date )
The individual and/or organisation listed as having been responsible for constructing the vessel. This can/may be the same as the owner and/or manager.
Pot Bros ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868, Certificate for Vessels Navigated by Steam for Utrecht, 9 October 1868 1868, Correspondence from Louis Meyer to George B Seyfang, secretary of Lloyds Register London regarding Utrecht, 21 October 1868 1868, Correspondence regarding Utrecht, 20 October 1868 1868, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Longitudinal plan for Utrecht no date, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Plan of the afterend of Utrecht no date, Midship section for Ultrecht no date )
The country in which the vessel’s construction took place, at the time of writing.
The Netherlands ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868, Certificate for Vessels Navigated by Steam for Utrecht, 9 October 1868 1868, Correspondence from Louis Meyer to George B Seyfang, secretary of Lloyds Register London regarding Utrecht, 21 October 1868 1868, Correspondence regarding Utrecht, 20 October 1868 1868, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Longitudinal plan for Utrecht no date, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Plan of the afterend of Utrecht no date, Midship section for Ultrecht no date )
The country (flag) that a vessel is registered to, at the time of writing.
The Netherlands ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868 )
The individual and/or organisation listed
van Zeylen & Decker ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868 )
Name of surveyor.
Louis Meyer; Jan C W Loos ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868 )
Louis Meyer ( Correspondence from Louis Meyer to George B Seyfang, secretary of Lloyds Register London regarding Utrecht, 21 October 1868 1868 )
Jan C W Loos ( Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Plan of the afterend of Utrecht no date )
Classification symbol assigned to a vessel by Lloyd’s Register’s Classing Committee denoting the quality of construction and maintenance.
A1 for 8 years ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868 )
A vessel’s means of propulsion.
Steam ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868, Certificate for Vessels Navigated by Steam for Utrecht, 9 October 1868 1868, Correspondence from Louis Meyer to George B Seyfang, secretary of Lloyds Register London regarding Utrecht, 21 October 1868 1868, Correspondence regarding Utrecht, 20 October 1868 1868, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Longitudinal plan for Utrecht no date, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Plan of the afterend of Utrecht no date, Midship section for Ultrecht no date )
Is the steamer assisted by sail?
No ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868, Certificate for Vessels Navigated by Steam for Utrecht, 9 October 1868 1868, Correspondence from Louis Meyer to George B Seyfang, secretary of Lloyds Register London regarding Utrecht, 21 October 1868 1868, Correspondence regarding Utrecht, 20 October 1868 1868, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Longitudinal plan for Utrecht no date, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Plan of the afterend of Utrecht no date, Midship section for Ultrecht no date )
A ship’s total internal capacity of a ship measured in register tons from the top of the floors to the tonnage deck.
1619 ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868 )
Type of timbering specifically utilised for the vessel’s interior.
RiP - Riga Pine ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868 )
Is machinery fitted at the aft of the vessel?
No ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868, Certificate for Vessels Navigated by Steam for Utrecht, 9 October 1868 1868, Correspondence from Louis Meyer to George B Seyfang, secretary of Lloyds Register London regarding Utrecht, 21 October 1868 1868, Correspondence regarding Utrecht, 20 October 1868 1868, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Longitudinal plan for Utrecht no date, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Plan of the afterend of Utrecht no date, Midship section for Ultrecht no date )
Generally a smaller additional auxiliary boiler (often used while the vessel is at port).
No ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868, Certificate for Vessels Navigated by Steam for Utrecht, 9 October 1868 1868, Correspondence from Louis Meyer to George B Seyfang, secretary of Lloyds Register London regarding Utrecht, 21 October 1868 1868, Correspondence regarding Utrecht, 20 October 1868 1868, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Longitudinal plan for Utrecht no date, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Plan of the afterend of Utrecht no date, Midship section for Ultrecht no date )
Name of the Proving House responsible for the public testing and certification of a vessel’s anchors and/or chain cables.
No ( Composite Ship Report of Survey for Utrecht, 15 October 1868 1868, Certificate for Vessels Navigated by Steam for Utrecht, 9 October 1868 1868, Correspondence from Louis Meyer to George B Seyfang, secretary of Lloyds Register London regarding Utrecht, 21 October 1868 1868, Correspondence regarding Utrecht, 20 October 1868 1868, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Longitudinal plan for Utrecht no date, Midship section plan for Utrecht no date, Plan of the afterend of Utrecht no date, Midship section for Ultrecht no date )
Used to indicate the capability of early reciprocating steam engines, based on dimensions rather than performance. It is not a true indication of actual engine power.
Have you noticed missing or incorrect data or images for this ship?
Please let us know and we will rectify the issue as soon as possible.